This site will be dedicated to Adam Umholtz megashinepro@yahoo.com

He lives in Fl. And CPS kidnapped his children because some woman wanted to have sex with his oldest daughter! False allegations wherein it was proven and now CPS won’t return his children!

Stay tuned for Videos and other news reports as the become known!

"Your statement that I have disgraced my judgeship is true," Ciavarella wrote in a letter to the court. "My actions have destroyed everything I worked to accomplish and I have only myself to blame."  FULL STORY

Just think about how much lying, denying, stonewalling, public disbelief, and indignant official defensiveness happened before these "judges" finally went down.  Thousands more just like them in the unconstitutional administrative "law" "courts" of NO DUE PROCESS.  EXACTLY what is happening with CPS and the family courts -
KIDNAPPING KIDS FOR MONEY.  Of course, we are seeing plenty of lying, denying, stonewalling, and public disbelief about CPS and the family courts.  END ALL IMMUNITY NOW!

 

Alex Jones vs. CPS Agent
Sep 8, 2007 
Audio from the radio show.  Unbelievable.

Court Watcher T Shirt

Get this Court Watcher T shirt here!

A gun in hand is better than 911 on the cell.

This T shirt idea was submitted by the fine folks at The Court Watcher. Please contact us with your Contro-T shirt idea!!!!! If we think your idea has a potential for sales, we'll list it here, and you can make a portion of the proceeds!

Before ordering, please view our size chart and color chart. . Please email us any questions.

Contro-T’s made this shirt after we had been attacked in Fallbrook.

We proudly wear this shirt to town meetings and while shopping.

You should see a sheriff officers face when they realize what our shirts say.

The Freedom cartoonRON PAUL SUPPORTERS! The Freedom cartoon

A Fathers Miricle A Fathers Miricle

 

A Fathers Miracle 2

A Fathers Miracle 2

news clip 9-27-08 Fathers Supporting Fathers

news clip 9-27-08 Fathers Suppor...

http://www.talkshoe.com/custom/images/icons/TC-17898-MainIcon.gif

RADIOFREEAMERICA
Phone Number: (724) 444-7444
Call ID: 17898

Every Saturday night at 6pm Pacific Time

NCP Support & Empowerment Exchange

Joshua Rose Foundation

Phone Number: (724) 444-7444
Call ID: 28046

Micheal Golden & The American Reconstruction Project

Saturday at 6:00pm Pacific time.

 www.crusaderadio.com

conference line at: (218) 339-4600 and the Pin Code is 551898#

Rod Class on TV #2 of 4 clip

Click here to go to Rod's Impeachment papers and video

Rev. William's Video - February 20, 2009, 01:57 PM

Rev. William's Video – 2-20-09, 01:57 PM

The  Judge Sim Von Kalinowski. that holds star chamber hearings without a jury

Judge Sim Von Kalinowski formally served 2-29-09

Judge Sim Von Kalinowski formally served 2-29-09

Michael Badnarik Constitution Class Part 1

Michael Badnarik: Constitution Class Part 2

Michael Badnarik: Constitution Class Part 3

Badnarik Constitution Class Part 4

Badnarik Constitution Class Part 5

Badnarik Constitution Class Part 6

Badnarik Constitution Class Part 7

Gayle Sierens Channel 8 news.

Gayle Sierens

Lynn Carson

Bob Hite

TBO.com

P.O. Box 191

Tampa, FL 33601

Sales & administration

(813) 259-8010

Email: tbosales@tbo.com

Tampa Tribune Newsroom (813) 259-7600

WFLA Newsroom (813) 221-5788

TBO.com Newsroom (813) 221-5789

Gayle Sierens

Lynn Carson

Email Bob Hite

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFATbUZXMD0

Sierens: A DCF custody battle takes a toll on a father’s health. What he's gone through in hopes of bringing his little home.  But first a father’s heart ache.  He was kept away from his daughter, after being wrongfully accused of abusing her.  Tonight the stunning mistakes made by the agency designed to keep families together.

Good evening everyone I'm Gayle Sierens, and I'm Bob Hite,

Hite:  Thank you for being with us tonight. Just when we'd thought we'd heard it all when it comes to Florida’s Department of Children and Families, then along comes the story of William Dunn.  Tonight on an 8 on your side investigation Lynn Carson shows us how one failure lead to another and worse yet, nobody seemed to care.

Make no mistake, about it (I had to put it on) this six year old is the princess of this palace with or without the crown.

Dunn: She's my life.

Carson: Mercedes father William Dunn fought a four year fight to win custody of his daughter, a battle that took a toll on his health.

Dunn: Within the past year I was hospitalized twice.

Carson: And his heart..

Dunn: I missed fathers day.

Carson: What he went through is worse then most parents could imagine. Court records show that Mercedes mother refused to follow a judges order that allowed him to visit his child.  Lakelyn police records show something much darker. The mother’s boyfriend attacked Mercedes, take a look at these pictures.  They show bruises on Mercedes arm, and a hand print on her face.  The Department of Children and Family documented this beating but never acted.  Then came a second incident of abuse.  A judge ordered that Mercedes live with her father, and suddenly the girls father found himself a target of an investigation, denied any contact with his daughter.

Dunn: There were allegations brought against me, that I sexually abused my daughter.

Carson: Mercedes mother made the false claim, neither police nor DCF ever looked into it, but for 9 and one half months the court barred Dunn from any contact with Mercedes.  Dunn drained his savings account borrowed thousands of dollars from his friends and his church to fight the false Charges.

Charlie Gist: It is hard to get it rights, every time. 

Carson: I told Gov. Charlie Gist about the William Dunn's story.

Gist: Should've they asked?

Carson: He doesn't understand why DCF workers didn't act faster and promises to review the case.

Gist: We can always do better obviously.

Carson: Dunn blames a broken DCF system for shutting innocent Florida fathers out of their kid’s lives.

Mercedes: That’s when my daddy took us to the beach.

Carson: Fathers who desperately want the picture perfect ending to Dunn now has, full custody of Mercedes.

Dunn: and my Miracle came true.

Carson: DCF refuses to talk about the specific case but a spokes person told me there is a no deadline for case workers to talk with parents accused of abuse. Dunn now owes 50,000 dollars to his lawyer, but he says that without an attorney, his daughter would be still be with her mothers, Bob.

Bob: Thank you Lynn, State Representative Baxtor Troutman also plans to investigate what he calls a tremendous breakdown in DCF.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUTud4m61aI

Part II

Gayle Sierens: Tonight at 11: falsely accused of sexually assaulting his daughter.  How this father, is helping dads fight for their rights when it comes to their children.

Unknown Man: County man who found himself in the fight of his life for his daughter, now wants to help other dads. In fact he wants to change Florida law.  As new channel Lynn Carson shows us William Dunn didn't set out to do it, but he has become the voice of and face for fathers rights.

Carson: We first introduced you to William Dunn and his daughter Mercedes last June.

Dunn: She's my life.

Carson: Dunn fought for 4 and a half years to see his daughters, stacked up 50,000 dollars in debt to do it. Some of which he borrowed from his church to pay his lawyer.  Mercedes mother falsely accused Dunn of sexually abusing their child.  Neither the Department of Children and Families, Nor police investigated and for 9 long months Dunn did not see his daughter.

Dunn: This tears your life apart, it destroys your life.  In my case, the allegations were false, and the mother admitted they were false, and it cleared my name.  In other cases, it could damage a man for rest of his life. 

Carson: Mercedes is now thriving.

Dunn: She's doing wonderful. She's ah straight A's this year.

Carson: And her father is life has taken on a whole new direction of it's own. Dunn says after he told us his story, other fathers found him.

Dunn: Allot of them have no hope. And I think my goal is to give them hope. 

Carson: Dunn kept on talking; he's the voice for fathers fighting for their rights.  He started an organization called fathers supporting fathers.  He plans rallies out side court houses, has an internet talk show and was even flown to a movie premier about a father fight that mirrors his own.  and now Dunn is working with law makers to change the existing law.

Dunn: We are trying to get a false allegations to be a felony (it is 18 -1001) not just a fine.

Carson: But above everything wholesale tires sales man is sold on just being a dad. He's a father who never gave up the fight for his daughter.  And Dunn has found power from pain. 

QA Carson 2 Dunn: What is the best thing about having your daughter around all the time.

Dunn: Just the glory of it. To have her there in my presents all the time, protected. That’s my heart, to know that my daughter is being safe.

Carson: Dunn is now suing DCF.  He says the system has bias towards mothers and he says he doesn't want anyone to be treated the way DCF workers treated him. In the Tampa news room this is Lynn Carson News Channel 8.

 

Statement by PJ Stewart of stoptyranny and courtwatchers

The Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) has lost it’s children in the “system” where it no longer can account for thousands of children.

Valkrie  

  • 09 Susan Curry Wolfe State social worker charged with theft of assistance money, food stamps Jacksonville Fl. - Source 1
  • 08 Ashley Trent Cook, Jacksonville social worker charged with having sex with teen patient. –Source 1
  • 08 Al Zimmerman - agency spokesman -child pornography - Source 1 2
  • 08 Luci Hadi - DCFS Chief - Resigned after contempt of court - Source 1
  • 08 Jerry Regier - DCFS Chief - accepted favors from contractors - Source 1
  • 08 Lee Johnson - executive vice president of SFYMCA - left during SFYMCA review - Source 1 
  • 08 Mark Foley, who served more than a decade in Congress, was never charged with a crime. Source 1
  • 07 Christy Kane - SFYMCA Senior VP of CBC Operations- announced resignation during review - Source 1
  • 07 Paul Hill Social worker charged with possession of child porn BISMARCK, N.D. - Source 1
  • 07 Jennifer Batiste Social Security Administration Worker Charged In Identity Theft Scheme 2.5 million Leimert Park, Ca. - Source 1
  • 06 Mark Foley - Florida representative, chaired the House caucus on missing and exploited children - sexually explicit emails  to congressional pages. Source 1 2
  • 05 Gayle L. Hare, Social Worker Charged With Stealing Public Money Lakeville, Minn - Source 1
  • 04 Marie Mahler CPS Social Worker Charged With Perjury during TPR Hearing Cedar Falls Iowa
  • 04 Geralyn Graham Caregivers of long-missing foster child in Florida are charged with child abuse- Source 1
  • 04 Robert B. Williams - DCFS Chief - resigned after computer scandal - Source 1
  • 04 Gregory Coler - DCFS Chief - resigned under FBI investigation - Source 1
  • 03 Barbara Burger, licensed clinical social worker arrested on 19-count indictment of Medicaid fraud St. Louis, Mo. – Source 1
  • 03 Barbara Andreadis, Social Worker was charged for felony Medicaid fraud and felony insurance fraud. Berkeley Springs, WV. - Source 1
  • 02 Kathleen Kearney - DCFS Chief - Resigned after significant DCFS failures and loss of Rilya Wilson - Source 1 2 3
  • 02 Deborah Muskelly - Caseworker - lost Rilya Wilson and charged with 11 counts of grand theft, 21 counts of official misconduct and nine counts of petit theft. Source 1 2
  • Willie Harris - Caseworker Supervisor - resigned under pressure due to circumstances surrounding Rilya Wilson - Source 1
  • Cecilio Deleon - Caseworker - failure to report abuse of child - Source 1 2
  • 02 Erica Jones - Caseworker - Falsifying records on Alfredo Montez - Source 1 2
  • 02 Mirla Pronga - Caseworker - DUI while transporting 7 month old baby in foster care - Source 1
  • 02 Erica Jones, 140 child welfare workers across the state have been fired for various reasons, including failure to visit children in their care. - CNN - Source 1
  • 99 Deborah A. Hulbert, LCSW Licensed Clinical Social Worker Charged Medicaid Fraud  Charlotte County, FL - Source 1

williamwagener

 

Brian W. York

The Court Watchers <object id="object_player_1" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" width="100%" height="100%"><param name="movie" value="/googleplayer.swf?videoUrl=http://vp.video.google.com/videodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DXgAAADhWSSo1a3Pqx0tQK-5kyiVZS2LdGTl4xriyf1N3eTF-BCKnZSl-BGbBI9ILBSyLz4vFct0vFqD50giNZAsB41D3F5roXcfYhLArieXZq8Xf8aF1Usfsz_kq30XJt1fE_Q%26sigh%3D-rpDR8RrW_vHBqbE3qHq33CkX4E%26begin%3D0%26len%3D5395167%26docid%3D-5750169194473035330&thumbnailUrl=http://1.gvt0.com/ThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dvss%26contentid%3Da5afc7ff8d0e4de9%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw160%26hl%3Den%26sigh%3D5QT1zuNYo6JXgk1BveXE422tCNo&docid=-5750169194473035330&hl=en&q=The+Court+Watchers&enablejsapi=1&playerapiid=object_player_1"/><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><param name="flashvars" value="fs=true"/><embed id="embed_player_1" width="100%" height="100%" bgcolor="#000000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" flashvars="fs=true" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" src="/googleplayer.swf?videoUrl=http://vp.video.google.com/videodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DXgAAADhWSSo1a3Pqx0tQK-5kyiVZS2LdGTl4xriyf1N3eTF-BCKnZSl-BGbBI9ILBSyLz4vFct0vFqD50giNZAsB41D3F5roXcfYhLArieXZq8Xf8aF1Usfsz_kq30XJt1fE_Q%26sigh%3D-rpDR8RrW_vHBqbE3qHq33CkX4E%26begin%3D0%26len%3D5395167%26docid%3D-5750169194473035330&thumbnailUrl=http://1.gvt0.com/ThumbnailServer2%3Fapp%3Dvss%26contentid%3Da5afc7ff8d0e4de9%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw160%26hl%3Den%26sigh%3D5QT1zuNYo6JXgk1BveXE422tCNo&docid=-5750169194473035330&hl=en&q=The+Court+Watchers&enablejsapi=1&playerapiid=embed_player_1"/></object>

Atty. Casey Gwinn, 

Admits Perjury NOT prosecuted..Brian & P.J. - The Court Watchers.

 Videos (302)

Atty. Casey Gwinn, part 2 admits Perjury NOT prosecuted

Atty. Casey Gwinn, part 2 admits...

 

 Videos (302)

http://www.californiamenscenters.org/sitebuilder/images/domestic_abuse_hotline-285x135.jpg

1-888-7HELPLINE (1-888-743-5754)

THE SPECTRUM OF PARENTAL ALIENATION
SYNDROME (PART II)
Page 9
Click here for the full article

Atty. Gwinn 4 min short

Atty. Gwinn 4 min short

Short version of Atty. Casey Gwinn admitting NO prosecution for PERJURY in family...

 Videos (302)

Harry CROUCH

California Men's Centers

932 C Street, Suite B

San Diego, CA 92101

619-231-1909

harryal@earthlink.net

Meetings:

D second Wednesday of each month.

( last Saturday of each month 9:00 am @
Starbucks 4821 Clairemont Dr.

 San Diego, CA

SAN DIEGO - Eight new judges have been appointed to the San Diego County Superior Court, Gov. Schwarzenegger announced Monday. Sim von Kalinowski. The compensation for each position is $178,789.

HOW COME JUDGE VON KALINOWSKI Can pardon himself?

ForgaveHimself.pdf WASHINGTON —  On a September Sunday in 1974, President Gerald Ford told the nation it was time to "shut and seal this book" of Watergate by pardoning his predecessor, Richard Nixon.

Governor Schwarzenegger Appoints Eight to San Diego County ...

Jul 21, 2008 ... Von Kalinowski, 53, of San Diego, ...

Oath of office for

Judge SIM VON KALINOWSKI.

Statement of Economic Interests, Form 700 for the last 7 years.

www.fppc.ca.gov/forms/700-07-08/Form700-07-08.pdf  

C.A. Holds Local Judges’ Extra Benefits Unconstitutional
(October 14, 2008) (PDF)

January 27, 2009

Two Judges Agree to Plead Guilty to Kickback Scheme Involving Juvenile Offenders

Two Judges Agree to Plead Guilty to Kickback Scheme

How do you tell when a judge or an attorney is lying?

HIS MOUTH IS MOVING!

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=Elu&q=Judge+investigated+kickbacks&um=1&ie=UTF-8&imgefp=UTo7pqWnxsoJ&imgurl=graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/02/14/us/14judge.xlarge1.jpg
Suit Names 2 Judges Accused in a Kickback Case - Feb 14, 2009

... appeared before Judge Ciavarella while the kickback scheme was going on. ... the children and their families once the federal investigation was done. ...

New York Times - 359 related articles »

              I.            Enacting a bill of attainder without congresses full approval and signatures. 

DISTRICT ATTORNEY® & PRIVATEER JUDGE®, VIGILANTE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT ®  Employee(s) have since ______ illegally charged me without a indictment, making the child support a bill of attainder to defraud me, embezzle my money and enslave me.

(1)   A bill of attainder (also known as an act or writ of attainder) is an act of legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime, and punishing them, without benefit of a trial. The United States Constitution forbids both the federal and state governments to enact bills of attainder, in Article 1, Sections 9 and 10, respectively.

United States Constitution Article. I. Section. 9.

(Omitted text.) No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.  No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.  No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one  State over those of another; nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.  No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

Section. 10.

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

(Omitted text.) No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

 

           II.            Striking against the Government

DISTRICT ATTORNEY® & PRIVATEER JUDGE®, VIGILANTE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT ® Corpora FICTA’s® struck against the constitutional form of government, are part of a rogue agency which enacts bills of attainders.  The funds they receive as a rogue agent must be paid back to the US Treasury in full.

 

(2)   TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 93 > § 1918 Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the Government

 Whoever violates the provision of section 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—

(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(2) is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(3) participates in a strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; or

(4) is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia;

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both.

 

        III.            Contempt of the law, enumerating my rights.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY® & PRIVATEER JUDGE®, VIGILANTE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT ® Corpora FICTA’s struck against the constitutional form of government, are part of a rogue agency which excepts Social Security funds when those taxes we pay are only for disabled and elderly.  The funds they receive as a rogue agent must be paid back to the US Treasury in full.

 

(3)   Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

 

         IV.            Inflicting slavery,  and involuntary servitude where no crime was committed. 

DISTRICT ATTORNEY® & PRIVATEER JUDGE®, VIGILANTE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT ® Corpora  Ficta  Employee has in fact given a number to my rights and has disparaged my rights retained as inalienable.

(4)   AMENDMENT XIII

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party

shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

CONGRESS IS GIVING AWAY YOUR MONEY, do you think that they’ll enforce your rights?  Why should they, the ARE the LAW, not servants of the law..

Until you start forming your own juries will suffer the consequences of your apathy..

The government is PAID to do this, take care of that, there are checks and balances..

No Jury, no JUSTICE!

Subject: Court Fraud Practices v. Pro Se Litigants

 

In the following Feb 2009 ILS Newsletter, Tony Davis presents some background on court fraud and how federal courts practice it to cheat pro se litigants out of justice and due process.  He gives examples and tells you how to identify court fraud.

 


Bob Hurt - http://bobhurt. com
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate here:  http://bobhurt. com/lawdonation. htm
Study Jurisdictionary:  http://www.jurisdic tionary.com/ index.asp? refercode= HB0002
Join Lawmen:  lawmen-subscribe@ googlegroups. com
Free Downloads:  http://groups. google.com/ group/lawmen/ files
Save fuel:  http://www.fuelsave r-mpg.com/ affiliates/ jrox.php? id=145_1_ tlid_8_MailFoot


      ILS Services, Inc.

Austin Centre #1860

701 Brazos, Suite 500

Austin, TX 78701

(512)899-3300 (512)329-6468

ilsservicesinc@ yahoo.com 

FEBRUARY 2009 NEWSLETTER 

      ILS Services, Inc., a leading legal research firm, has discovered additional cases of court fraud related to the failure of judges to read pre se pleadings, and has developed procedures for you to determine if court fraud occurred in your case. 

      
The legal definition of court fraud is:  "Errors of omission or misstatement in the record conceivably may be of three kinds: (1) those which are accidental merely; (2) those due to honest difference of opinion or memory between the appellant and the trial justice; and (3) those due to deliberate and intentional fraud by the trial justice. …For judicial fraud, that is, deliberate and intentional falsification by the trial justice of the record, the remedy is by hearing, separately from the merits, on the charge of falsification. Moder v. United States, 62 F.2d 462, cert. denied. 1933, 288 US 599 (DC Cir. 1037).  Intentional and deliberate falsification includes deliberate refusal to certify a true record as well as actual certification of a false one.  Ibid. Such separate hearing will be granted on application of the appellant or by the court on its own motion when a charge so serious is made in the briefs. Ibid. " Clawans v. White, 112 F. 2d 189, (DC Cir. 1940)(citing Moder v. United States, 62 F.2d 462, cert. denied. 1933, 288 US 599, DC Cir. 1037). 

      
Court fraud in pro se appeals was first reported in the Jefferson Report which disclosed a pattern of fraud in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Gretna, Louisiana.  The Seventh, Ninth and Eleventh Circuit Federal Courts of Appeal are now linked to failure to read pro se pleadings, as well as the Federal District Courts for the Northern District of Texas, Eastern District of Texas, the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and the Federal District Court for the Western District of North Carolina.  The expanding investigation shows that the failure to read pro se pleadings is a common practice in the United States' state and federal courts.  ILS believes that this practice must be stopped. 

      
The statistics in criminal cases in the United States support the contention that many courts in the United States act fraudulently, doing nothing more than assisting prosecutors in obtaining plea agreements.  In fact, approximately 98.5% of all prosecutions in the United States result in pleas agreements.  This percentage is so tilted in favor of the prosecutors that the rights afforded by the Constitution to confront your accusers and the right to a grand jury indictment and trial have been virtually eliminated.  In most instances, the defendant is arrested and held in jail until he finally gives up and enters a plea agreement.  Many times the defendant's family or relatives are threatened in order to coerce a plea from the defendant.  Most attorneys, instead of becoming schooled in the law, become nothing more than plea bargain specialists, failing to research the facts of the case, failing to interview witnesses, failing to obtain any evidence, and failing to search for a valid defense. 
 
 
 

EXAMPLES OF COURT FRAUD 
 

      In U.S. v. Cavender, Eastern District of Texas, the judge and the magistrate allowed Cavender's attorney to have him arraigned, waive his right to indictment, and enter a plea of guilty all in the same day.  The attorney obtained no evidence and failed to even investigate the case.  When the defendant raised the issues on his 2255 motion, the magistrate and judge failed to even read the verified pleadings, attempted to block him from addressing his concerns or his Constitutional rights, tried to block him from having a hearing, and then retaliated against him by having the prison guards spray him with raw sewage.  His illegal imprisonment is now being addressed by Congress. 

      
In U.S. v. Willis, Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, the chief judge refused to read Wills' habeas petition, addressed improperly one of the issues without legal authority, and failed to even address any of the other five issues.  The fact that the judge had been waiting for a year on an appellate appointment probably influenced his refusal to overturn a case in the district court. 
 

HOW TO IDENTIFY COURT FRAUD 
 

      There are four ways to identify if court fraud occurred in your case.  The first way is to determine if the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law on the issues you presented.  Every court is required to identify the facts of your case and determine the law that is applied to the facts.  If the court fails to do that it is obvious that the court is attempting to manipulate the proceedings and steer the case toward the prosecution.  Findings and conclusions are required in both pre-trial and post-trial processes.  Since most judges in the United States are former prosecutors, it is no wonder that a fair trial is almost impossible.  If you cannot argue the facts and the applicable law related to a lower court decision, it is impossible for you to have a valid appeal.  The federal statute that requires the court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law is F.R.Civ.P.52( a).  Similar statutes apply for state cases. 

      
The second way to identify court fraud is to determine if the court made findings on all issues presented in your case.  A court is required to make findings on each and every issue you present.  Failure to do so leaves the case open and does not allow you to have a valid appeal.  The federal statute is F.R.Civ.P.54( b).  This requirement is jurisdictional, as no valid appeal may be had with issues remaining open in the lower court. 

      
The third way to identify court fraud in your case is to look at the transcripts and determine if the proceedings were steered to the prosecution.  This is apparent when the judge denies all defendant motions, regardless of their merit, and grants all prosecution motions.  This not only means the judge did not read the pleadings, is shows that he has predetermined the case in order to give it to the prosecutor. 
 
 
 

      
A fourth way to identify court fraud is when your verified pleadings, done by affidavit, are denied by the judge.  The law requires that all affidavits must be taken as true unless the prosecution can counter them with affidavit or evidence.  The attorney for the government is not supposed to present affidavits as a witness in a case.  Therefore, the affidavits or evidence must come from fact witnesses independent of the prosecutor.  If the court ignores your verified pleadings by affidavit, it never intended for you to have relief and is trying to steer the proceedings to the prosecution.  That is court fraud. 

CONCLUSION 
 

      In the New Orleans Times-Picayune of October 2008 the Jefferson Report first identified court fraud in the court systems of the United States.  After further investigation, what appeared to be an isolated incident by some lazy judges now appears to be widespread across the United States in both federal and state courts.  It is a massive fraud perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in order to force them into peonage and slavery in the profitable prison system of the United States.  It is estimated that fully 25% or more of people who are convicted are actually not guilty, but victims of the rush to justice by a fraudulent and corrupt judicial system. 

      
ILS has developed procedures to determine if the court in your case committed court fraud which would entitle you to have your case reopened and request indictment of the judge(s) involved.  ILS is reviewing the filings of its clients in order to take them back into court based on fraud, and obtain the relief they deserve.


--~--~------ ---~--~-- --~------ ------~-- -----~--~ ----~
You received this because you have membership in the "Lawmen" Google Group.
Comment to group owner - reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options - visit http://groups. google.com/ group/Lawmen

 

ILS Services, Inc.

      Austin Centre #1860

         701 Brazos, Suite 500

          Austin, Texas 78701

      (512) 334-6144/(512) 329-6468

ilsservicesinc@ yahoo.com 

JANUARY 2009 NEWSLETTER 

      In this newsletter we will discuss the fraud discovered in the Fifth Circuit and how to use it to get back into court and win your case.   

A. FRAUD DISCOVERED IN APPELLATE COURTS  

      ILS Services, Inc., a leading legal research firm headquartered in Austin, Texas, has long maintained that the courts of the United States do not read the petitions before them, particularly when they are filed pro se or unrepresented. 

      
That fact is now proven.  An article in the New Orleans Times Picayune, Sunday, October 26, 2008, disclosed the fraud in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

      
In the article, entitled the Jefferson Report, the paper disclosed that one of the clerks of the Fifth Circuit committed suicide in his office last year, and "his tortured farewell notes revealed an illegal and immoral practice in which appellate judges systematically ignored and rejected hundreds of appeals by inmates who lacked attorneys.  Jerrold Peterson was 55 when he killed himself May 21, 2007.  Though he admitted that he had suffered from depression for years, Peterson's notes said that he could no longer live with himself after rejecting appeal after appeal and handing them over to Chief Judge Edward Dufresne Jr, for his signature.  The law requires that pro se writ applications –appeals filed by people without attorneys – be reviewed by a three-judge panel.  The illegal process began in 1994 after a February meeting in which the judges agreed to let Dufresne handle pro se writs, according to documents filed with the Supreme Court.  …  the Gretna Police Department's investigation painted an unflattering account as to how Dufresne handled the incident.  In his police report, Detective Richard Russ said that the chief judge 'appeared to be evasive with specific answers' to questions about Peterson's employment; that Dufresne withheld a suicide note for hours before turning it over to police; and that Dufrense suggested that he be present when detectives questioned Peterson's secretary…..Wrote Peterson:  'Who's (sic) integrity is really in question when you have conveniently ignored your duty to review pro se criminal writ applications so you can reduce your workload, present a false picture of the court's workload, and charge large sums for work you haven't done."   

      
The evidence in the Fifth Circuit now creates an inference that judges, both district and appellate, do not read pro se filings. This happens in three ways: 

    1. Any pro se filing is automatically stamped as denied.  Not only is the evidence now available for the Fifth Circuit, but ILS has obtained evidence of the same procedure in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.  This procedure violates both the First Amendment right of access to the court and the Fifth Amendment right of Due Process.

 

    1. Filings are routinely given to a clerk for review, who then reviews the filings and makes his recommendations to the district court judge, who, without any review, or without proper review, automatically signs the proposed order from the clerk as if he had read the pleading.  Many clerks are just out of law school and do not have the experience to properly review criminal pleadings.  A petitioner is entitled to review from an Article III judge.  The violates the First Amendment right of access to the court and the Fifth Amendment right of Due Process.

 
 

    1. The judge sends the pleading to a Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendations.  The Magistrate Judge, who is not an Article III judge and is not appointed by the President, then writes up his report and recommendations and the judge adopts it without review.  A review of the Reports and Recommendations in most courts reveals that the district judges always adopt the Magistrate's Report and Recommendations, usually without review, particularly in pro se pleadings.  In essence, the Magistrate Judge is acting as a disguised Article III judge and is impersonating an Article III judge, not only a criminal act, but also a violation of the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. 

 

      1. USING THE FRAUD TO GET BACK INTO COURT

 

      ILS has now developed procedures to use the fraud committed by the judges, called judicial fraud, to get you back into court and get your case reversed.  The actions of the court constitute not only fraud but structural error, and are automatically reversible when presented.   

      For any clients, we will be presenting a claim related to your case, claiming structural error in the proceedings, and requesting your relief.   

      For others who wish to attack their case, we will present your claim for structural error in order to obtain your relief.   

      1. WINNING ARGUMENTS

 

ILS clients have now obtained hearings in 3 courts on Title 18, a hearing on Title 21, has received admitted facts on both the invalidity of Title 18 and Title 26 in 2 proceedings, and have recently had 2 cases dismissed during grand jury proceedings.   

The change in administration should be a good time to win your case.   The fraud discovered in the Fifth Circuit entitles you to get back into court.  Should you have any questions, call us.  Have a prosperous New Year. 

 

Download the original attachment

ILS Services, Inc.

      Austin Centre #1860

         701 Brazos, Suite 500

          Austin, Texas 78701

      (512) 334-6144/(512) 329-6468

ilsservicesinc@ yahoo.com 

JANUARY 2009 NEWSLETTER 

      In this newsletter we will discuss the fraud discovered in the Fifth Circuit and how to use it to get back into court and win your case.   

A. FRAUD DISCOVERED IN APPELLATE COURTS  

      ILS Services, Inc., a leading legal research firm headquartered in Austin, Texas, has long maintained that the courts of the United States do not read the petitions before them, particularly when they are filed pro se or unrepresented. 

      That fact is now proven.  An article in the New Orleans Times Picayune, Sunday, October 26, 2008, disclosed the fraud in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

      In the article, entitled the Jefferson Report, the paper disclosed that one of the clerks of the Fifth Circuit committed suicide in his office last year, and "his tortured farewell notes revealed an illegal and immoral practice in which appellate judges systematically ignored and rejected hundreds of appeals by inmates who lacked attorneys.  Jerrold Peterson was 55 when he killed himself May 21, 2007.  Though he admitted that he had suffered from depression for years, Peterson's notes said that he could no longer live with himself after rejecting appeal after appeal and handing them over to Chief Judge Edward Dufresne Jr, for his signature.  The law requires that pro se writ applications –appeals filed by people without attorneys – be reviewed by a three-judge panel.  The illegal process began in 1994 after a February meeting in which the judges agreed to let Dufresne handle pro se writs, according to documents filed with the Supreme Court.  …  the Gretna Police Department's investigation painted an unflattering account as to how Dufresne handled the incident.  In his police report, Detective Richard Russ said that the chief judge 'appeared to be evasive with specific answers' to questions about Peterson's employment; that Dufresne withheld a suicide note for hours before turning it over to police; and that Dufrense suggested that he be present when detectives questioned Peterson's secretary…..Wrote Peterson:  'Who's (sic) integrity is really in question when you have conveniently ignored your duty to review pro se criminal writ applications so you can reduce your workload, present a false picture of the court's workload, and charge large sums for work you haven't done."   

      The evidence in the Fifth Circuit now creates an inference that judges, both district and appellate, do not read pro se filings. This happens in three ways: 

    1. Any pro se filing is automatically stamped as denied.  Not only is the evidence now available for the Fifth Circuit, but ILS has obtained evidence of the same procedure in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.  This procedure violates both the First Amendment right of access to the court and the Fifth Amendment right of Due Process.

 

    1. Filings are routinely given to a clerk for review, who then reviews the filings and makes his recommendations to the district court judge, who, without any review, or without proper review, automatically signs the proposed order from the clerk as if he had read the pleading.  Many clerks are just out of law school and do not have the experience to properly review criminal pleadings.  A petitioner is entitled to review from an Article III judge.  The violates the First Amendment right of access to the court and the Fifth Amendment right of Due Process.

 
 

    1. The judge sends the pleading to a Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendations.  The Magistrate Judge, who is not an Article III judge and is not appointed by the President, then writes up his report and recommendations and the judge adopts it without review.  A review of the Reports and Recommendations in most courts reveals that the district judges always adopt the Magistrate's Report and Recommendations, usually without review, particularly in pro se pleadings.  In essence, the Magistrate Judge is acting as a disguised Article III judge and is impersonating an Article III judge, not only a criminal act, but also a violation of the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. 

 

      1. USING THE FRAUD TO GET BACK INTO COURT

 

      ILS has now developed procedures to use the fraud committed by the judges, called judicial fraud, to get you back into court and get your case reversed.  The actions of the court constitute not only fraud but structural error, and are automatically reversible when presented.   

      For any clients, we will be presenting a claim related to your case, claiming structural error in the proceedings, and requesting your relief.   

      For others who wish to attack their case, we will present your claim for structural error in order to obtain your relief.   

      1. WINNING ARGUMENTS

 

ILS clients have now obtained hearings in 3 courts on Title 18, a hearing on Title 21, has received admitted facts on both the invalidity of Title 18 and Title 26 in 2 proceedings, and have recently had 2 cases dismissed during grand jury proceedings.   

The change in administration should be a good time to win your case.   The fraud discovered in the Fifth Circuit entitles you to get back into court.  Should you have any questions, call us.  Have a prosperous New Year. 

Your Fired! http://www.stoptyranny.net/fired.doc 

http://www.historyofinvention.info

http://www.kflex.org

http://www.stoptyranny.info 

http://www.stoptyranny.org     

http://www.stoptyranny.us   

 http://www.stoptyranny.net/  

http://www.shipbuilder.us/

http://www.shipbuilder2.info/

http://www.thecourtwatcher.com 

http://www.courtwatchers.net   

Pastor PJ Stewart
Investigative reporter
Court Watcher
Stop Tyranny NET ORG INFO US
I am a pastor, not a doctor or attorney.
I am a lone wolf, I affiliate with whom I choose for as long as I choose. When I choose not to affiliate with someone, it may or may not be for a good reason. Unless I am acting as your pastor and your paying me tithes, I am acting as a member of the press. I do NOT condone anyone calling the ENEMY for any reason! (CPS-APS) IF you are a government servant you have given up all rights to privacy and to the 5th amendment. Setting on your Apathy is a SIN!